top of page

Lawsuit Claims Subway Tuna Sandwich Has Chicken, Pork And Beef DNA

  • Writer: By The Financial District
    By The Financial District
  • Nov 14, 2021
  • 2 min read

A new version of a lawsuit accusing Subway of deceiving the public about its tuna products said lab testing shows they contain animal proteins such as chicken, pork, and cattle and not the advertised "100% tuna."


Photo Insert: Proposed class action suggests that there's something fishy going on with the ingredients of Subway's tuna.



Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin filed a third version of their proposed class action this week in the federal court in San Francisco near their homes in Alameda County, Jonathan Stempel reported for Reuters. Subway said in a statement it will seek to dismiss the "reckless and improper" lawsuit.


The chain said the plaintiffs have "filed three meritless complaints, changing their story each time," and that its "high-quality, wild-caught, 100% tuna" was regulated strictly in the United States and around the world.



Since the case began in January, Subway has run TV ads and launched a website defending its tuna. It also revamped its menu but not its tuna, saying an upgrade wasn't needed.


The original complaint claimed that Subway tuna salads, sandwiches, and wraps were "bereft" of tuna, while an amended complaint said they were not 100% sustainably caught skipjack and yellowfin tuna.


All the news: Business man in suit and tie smiling and reading a newspaper near the financial district.

US District Judge Jon Tigar dismissed the second version last month, saying the plaintiffs did not show they bought Subway tuna based on alleged misrepresentations. He did not rule on the merits and gave the plaintiffs another chance to make their case.


The Nov. 8 lawsuit relies on testing by a marine biologist of 20 tuna samples taken from 20 Subway restaurants in southern California.


Business: Business men in suite and tie in a work meeting in the office located in the financial district.

It said 19 samples had "no detectable tuna DNA sequences," while all 20 contained detectable chicken DNA, 11 contained pork DNA, and 7 contained cattle DNA. Many people cannot eat various meats because of diet or religious issues.


The complaint said the testing showed that Subway mislabeled its tuna products, and "duped" consumers into paying premium prices.





Optimize asset flow management and real-time inventory visibility with RFID tracking devices and custom cloud solutions.
Sweetmat disinfection mat

TFD (Facebook Profile) (1).png
TFD (Facebook Profile) (3).png

Register for News Alerts

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • X
  • YouTube

Thank you for Subscribing

The Financial District®  2023

bottom of page